페이지 정보작성자 악동팀 작성일20-06-06 15:58 조회3회 댓글0건
ar II. The court made similar rulings in November against another company, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, triggering disputes between the two countries.The Japanese firms have not complied with the court 롤대리 orders, prompting the victims to take legal steps toward seizure or liquidation of the companies??assets in Korea.?쏪apan is taking the problem much more seriously than Korea, as it views this as a case where Japanese companies are facing the confiscation of their assets overseas,??Lee Won-deog, a professor of Japanese studies at Kookmin University, told The Korea Herald. The 롤대리 major stumbling block between the two sides is Japan?셲 argument that colonial-era reparations were settled by the 1965 Normalization Treaty, under which Japan provided $500 million to Korea in economic assistance rather than paying formal reparations to individuals. The Korean government maintains that a government cannot meddle in a court decision within a democratic system.?쏪apan believes that the individual rights of victims of forced labor to make claims for damages were forgone under the 1965 treaty while Korea?셲 stance has been accepted by the international community because individual rights 롤대리 cannot be abridged under international law,??Sejong University professor Yuji Hosaka said in an interview with broadcaster YTN on May 26. On May 20, the Japanese government made a request for Korea to set up an arbitration panel involving a third-country member to address the matter of wartime forced labor under Tokyo. Seoul has not responded to the call, saying it will examine the proposal. The establishment of an arbitration panel would require consent from both countries. Realistic options for a settlement?Former Korean envoys and politicians have suggested the establishment of a foundation to com
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.